NetForum uses cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use the site, we'll assume that you are happy to receive these cookies on the NetForum website. Read about our cookies.
NetForum Community
Learn. Share. Optimize.
Log in | Sign up now | Submit content | Contact
Go to similar content

Comprehensive use of cardiac computed tomography to guide left ventricular lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy

Publication
Philips CT Clinical Science Philips Healthcare • USA

Behar JM, Rajani R, Pourmorteza A, Preston R, Razeghi O, Niederer S, Adhya S, Claridge S, Jackson T, Sieniewicz B, Gould J, Carr-White G, Razavi R, McVeigh E, Rinaldi CA.

 

This article originally appeared in the September 2017 issue of Heart Rhythm.

Background

Optimal lead positioning is an important determinant of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response.

 

Objective

The purpose of this study was to evaluate cardiac computed tomography (CT) selection of the optimal epicardial vein for left ventricular (LV) lead placement by targeting regions of late mechanical activation and avoiding myocardial scar.

 

Methods

Eighteen patients undergoing CRT upgrade with existing pacing systems underwent pre-implant electrocardiogram-gated cardiac CT to assess wall thickness, hypoperfusion, late mechanical activation, and regions of myocardial scar by the derivation of the stretch quantifier for endocardial engraved zones (SQUEEZ) algorithm. Cardiac venous anatomy was mapped to individualized American Heart Association (AHA) bull's-eye plots to identify the optimal venous target and compared with acute hemodynamic response (AHR) in each coronary venous target using an LV pressure wire.

 

Results

Fifteen data sets were evaluable. CT-SQUEEZ-derived targets produced a similar mean AHR compared with the best achievable AHR (20.4% ± 13.7% vs 24.9% ± 11.1%; P = .36). SQUEEZ-derived guidance produced a positive AHR in 92% of target segments, and pacing in a CT-SQUEEZ target vein produced a greater clinical response rate vs non-target segments (90% vs 60%).

 

Conclusion

Pre-procedural CT-SQUEEZ-derived target selection may be a valuable tool to predict the optimal venous site for LV lead placement in patients undergoing CRT upgrade.

For more information about this publication, check out the PubMed listing for this article.


This content has been made possible by NetForum Community.
Share this on: Share your link in twitter Share your link in facebook Share your link on LinkedIn Print Rate this article: Log in to vote

 
Rating:
Votes:
0
Views:
49
Added:
Oct 24, 2017

Rate this:
Log in to vote
 

Publication
iCT
Cardiac, ECG-gated, iDose4, Interventional, left ventricle, myocardial perfusion, Vascular
 

Clinical News
Best Practices
Case Studies
Publications and Abstracts
White Papers
Web seminars and Presentations
ExamCards
Protocols
Application Tips and FAQ
Training
Try an Application
Business News
Case Studies
White Papers
Web Seminars and Presentations
Utilization Services
Contributing Professionals
Contributing Institutions
Become a Contributor