NetForum uses cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use the site, we'll assume that you are happy to receive these cookies on the NetForum website. Read about our cookies.
NetForum Community
Learn. Share. Optimize.
Log in | Sign up now | Submit content | Contact
Go to similar content

Non-invasive coronary angiography with multislice computed tomography

Publication
Philips CT Clinical Science Philips Healthcare

Hoffmann MH, Shi H, Schmitz BL, Schmid FT, Lieberknecht M, Schulze R, Ludwig B, Kroschel U, Jahnke N, Haerer W, Brambs HJ, Aschoff AJ.

 

Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital, Ulm, Germany. martin.hoffmann@medizin.uni-ulm.de

 

* Originally published in the May 2005 edition of the Journal of the American Medical Association.


Context

Multislice computed tomography (MSCT) has recently evolved as a modality for noninvasive coronary imaging.

 

Objective
To assess the accuracy and robustness of MSCT vs the criterion standard of invasive coronary angiography for detection of obstructive coronary artery disease.

 

Design, Setting, and Patients
Prospective, single-center study conducted in a referral center setting in Germany and enrolling 103 consecutive patients (mean age, 61.5 [SD, 9.7] years) from November 2003-August 2004 who were undergoing both invasive coronary angiography and MSCT using a scanner with 16 detector rows.

 

Main Outcome Measures
Blinded results for both modalities compared using the patient as the primary unit of analysis, with supplementary segment- and vessel-based analyses.

 

Results
One thousand three hundred eighty-four segments (≥ 1.5 mm diameter) were identified by invasive coronary angiography; non-diagnostic image quality of MSCT was identified for only 88 (6.4%) of these segments, mainly due to faster heart rates. Compared with invasive coronary angiography for detection of significant lesions (> 50% stenosis), segment-based sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of MSCT were 95%, 98%, 87%, and 99%, respectively. Quantitative comparison of MSCT and invasive coronary angiography showed good correlation (r = 0.87, P < .001), with MSCT systematically measuring greater-percentage stenoses (bias, + 12%). In the patient-based analysis, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.97 (95% confidence interval, 0.90-1.00), indicating high discriminative power to identify patients who might be candidates for revascularization (> 50% left main artery stenosis and/or > 70% stenosis in any other epicardial vessel). Threshold optimization allowed either detection of these patients with 100% sensitivity at a reasonable false-positive rate (specificity, 76.5%; MSCT stenosis, > 66%) or optimization of both the sensitivity and specificity (> 90%; MSCT stenosis, > 76%).

 

Conclusion
Multislice computed tomography provides high accuracy for noninvasive detection of suspected obstructive coronary artery disease. This promising technology has potential to complement diagnostic invasive coronary angiography in routine clinical care.

 

For more information about this publication, check out the PubMed listing for this article.



This content has been made possible by NetForum Community.
Share this on: Share your link in twitter Share your link in facebook Share your link on LinkedIn Print Rate this article: Log in to vote

 
Rating:
Votes:
0
Views:
965
Added:
Mar 31, 2006

Rate this:
Log in to vote
 

Publication
Brilliance 16 Power, Brilliance 16-slice
Cardiac, coronary angiography, coronary arteries, coronary artery disease, image quality, lesions, prospective, quantitative CT, stenosis, Vascular
 

Clinical News
Best Practices
Case Studies
Publications and Abstracts
White Papers
Web seminars and Presentations
ExamCards
Protocols
Application Tips and FAQ
Training
Try an Application
Business News
Case Studies
White Papers
Web Seminars and Presentations
Utilization Services
Contributing Professionals
Contributing Institutions
Become a Contributor